Date: 30/04/2013
NEHRU SERVING ISLAM
REF: mail below.
Nehru was the illegitimate son of a MOHAMMEDAN who had an illicit affair with his biological mother. That is how he believed, thought and acted, and behaved towards the HINDUS as well as Hindusthan. It is inconceivable that a Hindu, however demoralised and timid, could deny his Faith in Hindusthan.
His secret preference for ISLAM showed up clearly when he facilitated the Indian Muslims, represented by MOHAMMED Ali Jinnah, to achieve their goal of giving a lethal blow to Bharat, his own land of birth.
A Muslim will readily and gladly give LAND away if he is living in Hindusthan but will tenaciously fight for it if he is in an ISLAMIC republic. By this yardstick NEHRU was a Mohammedan.
It is a shame that MOST Hindus who regard him as their leader, and worse still, as a patriot, do not ask simple questions, e.g.,
How was he expected to react when Jinnah asked for his Pakistan?
(HE WAS EXPECTED TO SAY, "THAT IS HIGH TREASON, BROTHER MOHAMMED. NEVER MENTION SUCH FILTH AGAIN")
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree.
What was he expected to do when the wholesale massacre of Hindus began in Noakhali and Rawalpindi? (HE WAS TO GO THERE AND WARN THE MUSLIMS, AND COMFORT AND SUCCOUR THE HINDU VICTIMS.)
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree
Was he not expected to put at least ONE condition for the free gift of ONE THIRD of India to Mohammed? (YES, DEFINITELY SO. THAT CONDITION WAS TRANSFER OF POPULATION. BUT NEHRU WANTED TO SERVE THE MUSLIMS WHILE SLAUGHTERING THE HINDUS.)
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree
Was he not, as the TOP national leader, expected to sit down and consider the IMPLICATIONS of Partition for the Hindus in Pakistan and the Muslims in BROKEN BLEEDING Bharat (Post-Partition India) since the Hindus would be degraded, insulted, converted and even killed and beheaded in Pakistan and the Muslims in India would remain SUSPECT and considered TRAITORS so long as the breakaway PAKISTAN exists?
(YES, DEFINITELY. THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HINDUS WERE OUTRIGHT DISCRIMINATION, DEGRADATION,D FEAR OF ETHNIC CLEANSING, MASS ABDUCTION AND RAPE, AND FOR THE MUSLIMS THE LABELs OF "TRAITORS" & "MOTHER KILLERS".)
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree
How was he supposed to react strongly and decisively when millions of begraggled and penniless Hindus started coming over the border in three clothes after losing their homes, lands, businesses, jobs, and in many cases, even their daughters and wives? (HE WAS TO MOVE HIS OFFICE TO WAGAH OR FEROZEPUR, THE POINT OF ENTRY OF MILLIONS OF HINDU REFUGEES AND RECEIVE THEM. HIS STAFF WAS TO RECORD THEIR NAMES & PREVIOUS ADDRESSES, DIRECT THEM TO DIFFERENT CAMPS SET UP FOR THEM AND GIVE THEM CASH AND COUPONS FOR FOOD AND PURCHASE OF ESSENTIALS).
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree
How was he supposed to decide on the IDENTITY of Broken Bharat after becoming the Prime Minister? (SEEING PAKISTAN GO UNDER ISLAMIC CONSTITUTION, NEHRU HAD TO DECLARE HIS OWN TRUNCATED BHARAT A "HINDU REPUBLIC" TO SAVE HINDUISM FROM EXTERMINATION AND THE SIKHS FROM THE SUBSEQUENT MASSACRES AND "FAKE ENCOUNTERS".)
Dear readers, please do contradict this if you disagree
Does it not prove that NEHRU was a Mohammedan? He was outwardly Secular but inside? DEFINITELY NOT A HINDU!
What about his daughter? What was the QUALITY of Hindu media that could not muster guts to print her name as MAIMOONA BEGUM and also the FAMILY TREE of her husband Feroze KHAN to show whether they were Parsi. Mohammedan or "mongrel"? Did Maimoona Begum, the Prime Minister of Hindusthan give FREDOM OF EXPRESSION to the Hindus when she imposed EMERGENCY? Is it not a FACT that she never visited Ayodhay? In fact she looked at the Sri Ram Temple in Ayodhya through the eyes of BABUR and at the Golden Temple in Amritsar through the eyes of AURANGZEB. As even a "demolished" Hindu she would have visited Ayodhya to have a look at the RUINS and as even an untouchable (Achchut) Hindu she would have spared Golden Temple (Harmandir) in Amritsar instead of maliciously and vindictively choosing the very day fo a GURPURB to attack the sacred Temple Complex in order to kill MAXIMUM number of Sikh men, women and children in the congregation.
The CRIMES of All-India Congress Party will not remain hidden for ever. TRUTH WILL EVENTUALLY COME OUT though NOT SOON since the Hindus are cowards as Mahatma Gandhi declared in public.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
30 Apr 13.
=========.
In a message dated 29/04/2013 15:41:09 GMT Daylight Time, xxxxxxxxxx writes:
SUB: Our statesman
Mr Nehru as a child was incapable of deciding his own future. He had no idea of what he will be when he grows up. His father Mr Motilal Nehru had to plan Jawaharlal’s education etc. Motilal wanted his Son to be an ICS officer. So…..
· Jawaharlal attempted to study for ICS and miserably failed to fit the bill
· Then his father asked him to become a Barrister, Nehru though a backbencher in studies somehow struggled to complete the course
· But again Nehru woefully failed to become a successful Lawyer. He was a damp squib at the Law court
· Whereupon, Motilal realized that his Son was a ‘fit-for-nothing-guy’, and hence decided to make him a Politician (the rest is History)
Nehru never had any role in ‘deciding’ about what he should be,
What he “aspired” to be and
What he ultimately became
By the way, do you remember what George Bernard Shaw said about politicians?
“Politics is the last resort of a Scoundrel”,
George, indeed was right !!!
---------------------------
WE WISH NEHRU WAS ONLY A SCOUNDREL BUT NOT A TRAITOR WHO SURRENDERED OUR SACRED "DHARTI" (TERRITORY) FOR NOT EVEN A COIN OF BASE COPPER IN RETURN!)
=============================
000000000