Date: 29/11/2019
[hc] BJP CENSURES PRAGYA - TNIE 29/11/19 - THE ITALIAN VINCI CALLS PRAGYA AS A TERRORIST
Fri, 29 Nov 2019 16:43
Mohan Natarajan [hinducivilization] (hinducivilization@yahoogroups.com)
To: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
DEAR SIR
SOMETHING RADICALLY WRONG WITH BJP - THEY ARE GIVING A RUN
TO CONGIS IN THE MATTER OF SICKULARISM AND LESS we TALK ABOUT VINCI
THE BETTER
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sadhvi Pragya was incarcerated for nearly 9 years without a chargesheet. She was tortured so much that
her health became a casualty. She suffers from all sorts of ailments. HOW SHE WAS CALLED A
TERRORIST. It is CHIDAMBARAM, the then HOME MINISTER AND KARKARE OF THE
MAHARASHTRA ATS should be termed as terrorists.
ABRAHAM LINCOLN WAS ASSASSINATED BUT JOHN BOOTH WAS NOT CALLED
A TERRORIST
KENNEDY WAS ASSASSINATED BY LEE HARVEY OSWALD BUT HE WAS NOT
CALLED A TERRORIST
MARTIN LUTHER KING WAS ASSASSINATED BUT JAMES RAY WAS NOT CALLED
A TERRORIST
MAHATMA GANDHI WAS KILLED BY GODSE BUT HE IS BEING CALLED A
TERRORIST. WHY?
(the above information was gathered from a twitter)
In 1984, 4000 sikhs were massacred in broad day light by mobs led by congi goons. Can VINCI call the
congressmen as terrorists? How many congis have been punished for the genocide. It seems, all over
India, some 14000 sikhs were genocided.
In Kashmir, pandits were massacred brutally and ethnic cleansed. VINCI has not called the muslims
of kashmir, as terrorists. WHY?
Inquisition in Goa, resulting in the torture and death of countless hindus. CAN VINCI call the
poruguese christians, as terrorists?
British genocided more than 35 million hindus. Will VINCI CALL THE BRITISH, AS
TERRORISTS?
WHY I KILLED GANDHI? GODSE MADE A WRITTEN SUBMISSION TO THE COURT AND
AFTER READING THE LETTER, MANY WEPT AND MANY OPINED GODSE WAS RIGHT.
WILL TNIE PUBLISH THE FULL CONTENTS OF GODSE'S LETTER.
WHO IS GANDHI? The man who created Pakistan exclusively for muslims. Whether India was
his father's property.?
Why Gandhi did not allow Indian muslims to go to Pakistan despite Ambedkar advising Gandhi
to send back all muslims to Pakistan. Ambedkar felt muslims will never co-exist with hindus.
What made Gandhi to retain muslims despite creating a separate state for muslims.?
During Khilafat movement, Gandhi supported the muslims and when malayalees were
massascred by muslims in Kerala, Gandhi justified the killings in the name of Khilafat
movement. What father, what Gandhi? (mopla rebellion)
When millions of hindus were butchered during pre-partition riots, Gandhi did not
condemn the muslims. Instead, he tied the hands of hindus in the name of religion and
non-violence.
Godse felt that Gandhi was pro-muslim and if Gandhi had his ways, then hindus will
become garbages in India and hence, he assassinated Gandhi. KILLING A PERSON
IS WRONG. GODSE SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE THAT.
WHAT ABOUT THE MISDEEDS OF GANDHI? WHO WAS TO PUNISH HIM?
And now coming to zero IQ VINCI - everyone knows BABAR and his followers invaded India, looted
Indian assets, demolished temples and raped countless hindu women. Natwar Singh has written
in his book that dynasty prayed before the cemetry of BABAR in Iran. This shows what?
ALIGNING WITH RAPISTS, TERRORISTS AND LOOTERS. WILL VINCI ANSWER
THIS?
if BJP FOLLOWS STUPID SICKULARISM, THEN THEY CAN FORGET COMING TO
POWER IN 2024.
BJP SHOULD NOT INDULGE IN APPEASING ANY COMMUNITY.
N MOHAN
I AM ATTACHING BELOW AN EXCELLENT POSTING, EXPOSING THE DUPLICITY OF
MAHATMA GANDHI
Kalavai Venkat
Mahatma Nathuram Godse amar rahe! ----------- Sadhvi Praygya is being ...
Mahatma Nathuram Godse amar rahe!
----------------------------------------------------
Sadhvi Praygya is being vilified for calling Nathuram Godse a patriot. Now, even those who fault Godse's decision to assassinate M. K. Gandhi needn't deny that Godse loved his country and was patriotic. However, those who're anti-India, anti-Hindu, and anti-Hindutva rejoice in spinning the narrative that Gandhi was a patriot and since Godse assassinated him Godse couldn't be a patriot.
Was Gandhi really a patriot?
The great patriot and revolutionary Madan Lal Dhingra assassinated Curzon Wyllie in 1909. Wyllie had a been a top British colonial administrator who visited the worst predations upon Indians. What were those predations? Dhingra's own statement in the court give a clear answer:
[Quote] I hold the English people responsible for the murder of eighty millions of Indian people in the last fifty years, and they are also responsible for taking away £100,000,000 every year from India to this country. I also hold them responsible for the hanging and deportation of my patriotic countrymen, who did just the same as the English people here are advising their countrymen to do. And the Englishman who goes out to India and gets, say, £100 a month, that simply means that he passes a sentence of death on a thousand of my poor countrymen, because these thousand people could easily live on this £100, which the Englishman spends mostly on his frivolities and pleasures. Just as the Germans have no right to occupy this country, so the English people have no right to occupy India, and it is perfectly justifiable on our part to kill the Englishman who is polluting our sacred land. I am surprised at the terrible hypocrisy, the farce, and the mockery of the English people. They pose as the champions of oppressed humanity—the peoples of the Congo and the people of Russia—when there is terrible oppression and horrible atrocities committed in India; for example, the killing of two millions of people every year and the outraging of our women. In case this country is occupied by Germans, and the Englishman, not bearing to see the Germans walking with the insolence of conquerors in the streets of London, goes and kills one or two Germans, and that Englishman is held as a patriot by the people of this country, then certainly I am prepared to work for the emancipation of my Motherland.. [Unquote]
Wyllie, as top British colonial administrator, was guilty of masterminding and committing all of these crimes against India. So, Dhingra was entirely justified in assassinating him. Indians studying in London overwhelmingly supported Dhingra's actions.
Gandhi was brought in to unleash a propaganda of lies to vilify Dhingra and those who plotted the assassination of Wyllie and to justify British predatory rule. He wrote:
[Quote] It is being said in defense of Sir Curzon Wyllie’s assassination that...just as the British would kill every German if Germany invaded Britain, so too it is the right of any Indian to kill any Englishman.... The analogy...is fallacious. If the Germans were to invade Britain, the British would kill only the invaders. They would not kill every German whom they met.... They would not kill an unsuspecting German, or Germans who are guests. [Unquote]
Look at the utter dishonesty which Gandhi displays here. Dhingra, in the German analogy, only advocated killing those occupiers who walk "with the insolence of conquerors." However, Gandhi, cunningly and brazenly, lies that Dhingra advocated killing innocent people and guests. Gandhi, with this distorted portrayal, characterizes British predators such as Wyllie as "guests."
Gandhi then went on to make the most demeaning portrayal of Dhingra. He suggested that Dhingra had been brainwashed to assassinate Wyllie and argued that those who influenced him should be punished. The vicious hunt of such patriots as V.V.S. Aiyar ensued this hatchet job done by Gandhi. Gandhi further wrote:
[Quote] Even should the British leave in consequence of such murderous acts, who will rule in their place? Is the Englishman bad because he is an Englishman? Is it that everyone with an Indian skin is good? If that is so, there should be no angry protest against oppression by Indian princes. India can gain nothing from the rule of murderers—no matter whether they are black or white. Under such a rule, India will be utterly ruined and laid waste. [Unquote]
Here, Gandhi portrays:
1.) The revolutionary freedom fighters as vile murderers..
2.) The revolutionary fight for freedom as one motivated by racism.
3.) British occupation as desirable by cunningly diverting the attention to the alleged undesirability of rule by Indian princes (even though Indian princes hadn't committed any of the crimes Dhingra accused the British of - although those princes were British stooges just as Gandhi was).
This is how Gandhi was brought into politics by the British. He was a collaborator par excellence. So, Godse didn't assassinate a patriot. He only assassinated an unscrupulous liar and a vicious collaborator of colonial predators just as Dhingra had assassinated a colonial predator.. Sadly, the Brits and their collaborators have relentlessly spun a fake narrative of Gandhi as patriot which has been useful in vilifying genuine patriots such as Godse. It is time we judged Gandhi's reputation by his words and deeds and not judge his words and deeds by his carefully cultivated reputation.
Mahatma Nathuram Godse amar rahe!
=========================
000000000